Wednesday means up-tempo, so I headed for the track to get in my 6 x 800m workout. But before getting to that, here's an interesting little story about a college kid that apparently isn't all that bright. As I pulled into a nearly full parking lot at the community college and started looking for a space, I was nearly clipped by some kid backing out without looking behind him. After narrowly escaping the accident, I decided to go around him and look for another spot. As luck would have it, I circled the small lot and there were no spaces available, "damn, I guess I'll have to go back and see if the spot where the kid pulled out is still open". So I swing back around heading towards that spot and what do I see. . . . . the same kid standing behind his car next to another car. Yeah that's right - this genius had just backed into someone else!!
Now, I can see getting into an small accident in a parking lot - it happens. What I CAN'T see is how someone who isn't looking and "almost" gets into an accident can make the same mistake a whopping 5-seconds later and hit someone else. That takes real intelligence! In fact, shouldn't there be a Bud Light commercial about this guy? "Real Men of Genius" - Today we salute YOU, Mr. No-Look-Backer-Upper! (I could go on here and write the whole commercial, but my posts have been long enough as it is)
On to the workout. The plan was six 800m repeats w/ 2.5-min breaks. The pace was to start around 2:52 (5:45 mile pace) and ramp down to about 2:40 (5:20 pace). I was thinking something like this: 2:52, 2:50, 2:47, 2:45, 2:42, 2:40. However, I knew there was a good chance that the reps would be a bit faster. Here's the actual workout:
Rep # | Time | Ave HR | Max HR | HR- 128 | HR Min |
1 | 2:49 | 146 | 157 | 1:00 | 114 |
2 | 2:48 | 152 | 163 | 1:05 | 117 |
3 | 2:44 | 155 | 169 | 1:10 | 117 |
4 | 2:41 | 159 | 170 | 1:35 | 121 |
5 | 2:38 | 162 | 172 | 1:45 | 128 |
6 | 2:32 | 165 | 174 | 1:52 | |
The 2nd to last column shows how long it took for my HR to get back down to 128. (No specific reason why 128 is chosen other than that it's a point where I feel fully recovered, and I've been using this number to check recovery of many other workouts) The last column shows the HR at the end of the 2.5-minute recovery period.
You can see from the data that the first 3-reps were pretty easy and I was able to recover down to a 117 HR or better for each. The 4th rep maxed out at 170 HR which is what I believe to be close to the max of my Threshold zone (using 92% of max HR for this calculation) The recovery after rep #5 was substantially slower than the rest, so things were certainly changing by this time, but I still had no trouble running a 2:32 for the final rep.
If I were to have kept the reps between 2:41 - 2:46 I feel I could have done 8 or 9 of these w/ no issue. The workout never felt hard, on the contrary it was quite enjoyable the whole way, but that may be in large part because I simply love these types of workouts. I came away feeling really good, and this morning there is no soreness or fatigue to speak of. It was nice to throw a 2:32 up there after the 5 previous reps w/o really going ahead and "gunning it" - I could easily have run 2:20s here, but that wasn't the point of the workout. Interested to see what coach makes of the data.
Training:
10/15: 5-miles including 6 x 800m @ 2:49, 2:48, 2:44, 2:41, 2:38, 2:32
No comments:
Post a Comment